Guidant enters guilty plea to failing to report problems with defibrillators, will pay $296 million

by Ben Vernia | April 6th, 2010

On April 5, Guidant LLC pleaded guilty to violating the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The government had announced the company’s plea agreement on February 25. According to DOJ’s press release:

The medical device manufacturer’s admission of criminal wrongdoing is the result of a four-year investigation into Guidant’s handling of short-circuiting failures of three models of its implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the Ventak Prizm 2 DR (Model 1861) and the Contak Renewal (Models H135 and H155). Guidant’s Cardiac Rhythm Management division, which produced the defibrillators, is headquartered in Arden Hills, Minnesota.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators are lifesaving devices used to detect and treat abnormal heart rhythms that can result in sudden cardiac death, one of the leading causes of mortality in the United States. The devices, once surgically implanted, constantly monitor the electrical activity in a patient’s heart for deadly electrical rhythms and deliver an electrical shock to the heart in an effort to return the heartbeat to normal. If they fail to operate properly when needed, a person can die within minutes.

Under the terms of the plea agreement with the Justice Department to resolve the charges, which must still be approved by Judge Frank, Guidant pleaded guilty today to withholding information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding catastrophic failures in some of its lifesaving devices. Specifically, Guidant admitted to: (1) making a materially false statement in a required submission to the FDA with regard to the Ventak Prizm 2DR device; and (2) failing to notify the FDA of a “correction” to the Contak Renewal devices, which the company made to reduce a risk to health caused by the devices. As a result of these offenses, the agreement calls for Guidant to pay a combined criminal penalty in excess of $296 million.

Disclosure: I represented a member of Guidant’s Independent Panel as a third-party witness in product liability litigation.

Leave a Reply

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta